Федеральный центр мозга и нейротехнологий Федерального медико-биологического агентства России, Москва, Россия
Московская государственная академия физической культуры, Москва, Россия
INTRODUCTION. In accordance with the adopted new concept of healthcare in the Russian Federation and current legislation, the development of medical rehabilitation and habilitation in the Russian Federation is largely determined by the level of professional education of personnel with higher medical and non-medical education. In these conditions, an extremely important question is (which Universities) and how (under what programs and under what conditions) can and should train personnel in the field of rehabilitation in new specialties. AIM. To reveal the current problems of professional retraining of physical rehabilitation specialists according to the new model of medical rehabilitation and to determine the requirements for universities for setting up the programs for new specialties in the area of medical rehabilitation. CONCLUSION. The main requirements for universities planning to train physical rehabilitation specialists include: the availability of trained personnel – professors and practitioners in the field of medical and physical rehabilitation, able to give not only theoretical knowledge, but also practical skills in a new specialty, as well as the availability of a sufficient number of clinical bases of various profiles, the use of which would ensure compliance with the principle of “rotation” (change of profiles and stages of rehabilitation during the internship).
physical rehabilitation, universities, professional re-training, healthcare, internship
1. Ivanova G.E., Aronov D.M., Belkin A.A., Belyaev A.F., Bodrova R.A., Bubnova M.G., Buylova T.V., Mel'nikova E.V., Mishina I.E., Prokopenko S.V., Sarana A.M., Stahovskaya L.V., Suvorov A.Yu., Hasanova D.R., Cykunov M.B., Shmonin A.A., Shamalov N.A. Pilotnyy proekt «Razvitie sistemy medicinskoy reabilitacii v Rossiyskoy Federacii». Vestnik vosstanovitel'noy mediciny. 2016; (2): 2-6.
2. Moffat M. A history of physical therapist education around the world. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2012; 26(1): 13-23.
3. The evolution of physical therapy. Available at: http://www.jblearning.com/samples/0763740691/40691_CH01_FINAL.pdf (accessed 25.01.2022)
4. Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. 2012. Available at: https://capteonline.org (accessed 23.01.2022)
5. Buylova T.V., Ivanova G.E., Zverev Yu.P. Standartizaciya professional'noy podgotovki i deyatel'nosti fizicheskih terapevtov v Rossiyskoy Federacii. Vestnik Ivanovskoy medicinskoy akademii. 2017; (2): 9-15.
6. World Confederation for Physical Therapy 2011: Guidelines for Physical Therapist professional entry level education. Revised. WCPT, General Meeting. Amsterdam. 2011. Available at: http://www.wcpt.org/guidelines/entry-level-education (accessed 27.01.2022)
7. American Council of Academic Physical Therapy, American Physical Therapy Association, APTA Academy of education. Vision for excellence in phys ical therapy education. Culmination of the work of the education leadership partnership August 2021. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2021; 35(1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000216
8. Jette D.U., Brechter J.H., Heath A.E., Tschoepe B. Defining excellence in physical therapist education: a comparison of 2 theoretical perspectives. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2020; 34(3): 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000144
9. 9. Deusinger S.S., Hinman M.R., Peterson C. Positioning academic physical therapy for excellence through contemporary accreditation standards. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2018; 32(2): 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000053
10. 10. 2010-2011 Fact Sheet: Physical Therapist Education Programs. American Physical Therapy Association. Available at: https://nau.edu (accessed 22.02.2022)
11. European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White book on physical and rehabilitation medicine in Europe. Introductions, executive summary, and methodology. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 54(2): 125-155. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-087.18.05143-2
12. Taylor S.M., McMenamin P.J., Hilliard M.J. Collaborating to integrate education and practice: a model of a physical therapy academic-clinical partnership. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2022; 36(2): 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000220
13. Huhn K., Gilliland S.J., Black L.L., Wainwright S.F., Christensen N. Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: a concept analysis. Physical Therapy. 2019; (99): 440-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy148
14. Chesebro S.B., Jensen G.M., Boissonnault W.G. Entrustable professional activities as a framework for continued professional competence: is now the time? Physical Therapy. 2018; (98): 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx100
15. Magnusson D.M., Zachary D Rethorn Z.D., Bradford E.H., Maxwell J., Ingman M.S., Davenport T.E., Bezner J.R. Population health, prevention, health promotion, and wellness competencies in physical therapist professional education: results of a modified delphi study. Physical Therapy. 2020; 100(9): 1645-1658. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa056
16. Bliss R., Brueilly K.E., Swiggum M.S., Morris G.S., Williamson E.M. Importance of terminal academic degreed core faculty in physical therapist education. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2018; 32(2): 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000054
