The surgical procedure for an artificial joint – the endoprosthesis implantation significantly improves the patient’s quality of life and has a significant impact on his rehabilitation optimizing, necessary for a normal life in the future. Due to its anatomical characteristics and biomechanical ratio, the hip joint plays a critical role in maintaining body balance and proper gait. Endoprosthesis is used in a significant hip joint function disorder. Indications for the endoprosthesis may be degenerative changes, various injuries or some congenital disorders. A degenerative change, like coxarthrosis, leads to surgery due to its progression in almost all cases. Depending on an operator and a patient, this procedure can be performed in several ways depending on the chosen access to a thigh. Today, the direct access is most commonly used from the front, side, and rear. The difference is in a place of entry into the joint and the damage to the muscles caused by the procedure itself. Physiotherapy is required after the procedure. The process of physiotherapy begins immediately after the surgery, on the first day after the procedure. It is believed that, in the period of three to four months after rehabilitation, the patient can return to almost all the previous usual activities, of course, after examination and consultation with the doctor. Aim. To analyze the literature data on modern aspects of arthroplasty in the hip joint osteoarthrosis Results. Various arthroplasty complications in coxarthrosis can be associated with errors in the surgery techniques, as well as the lack of patients’ motivation. The number of studies concerning quality of life and therefore health is growing, and the research results can be used as relevant ones to represent the state of each individual group.
hip joint arthroplasty, osteoarthritis, prosthesis, rehabilitation, physiotherapy
1. Zagorodniy N.V., Evgeniy Sh.L., Batygin G.G. Registry po endoprotezirovaniyu tazobedrennogo sustava. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Medicina. 2012; (3): 66-71.
2. Stampella A., Monteagudo S., Lories R. Wnt signaling as target for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2017; 31(5): 721-729.
3. Alekseeva L.I. Osteoartrit: epidemiologiya, klassifikaciya, faktory riska i progressirovaniya, klinika, diagnostika, lechenie. Sovremennaya revmatologiya. 2019; 13(2): 9-21.
4. Goryannaya N.A., Ishekova N.I., Popov V.V., Bondarenko E.G. Izmenenie kachestva zhizni pacientov posle endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava na pervom etape reabilitacii. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2017; (1): 41-44.
5. Vishnyakov A.N. Istoriya endoprotezirovaniya v mire i v Rossii. Vestnik Vserossiyskogo obschestva specialistov po mediko-social'noy ekspertize, reabilitacii i reabilitacionnoy industrii. 2018; (3): 89-92.
6. Kubasov I.N., Savcov D.V. Effektivnost' i otdalennye rezul'taty endoprotezirovaniya krupnyh sustavov nizhnih konechnostey. Sovremennye aspekty zdravoohraneniya: dostizheniya i perspektivy. 2017: 450-452.
7. Gerasimova N.D., Kul'teleeva Zh.A., Smolyar Ya.V. Sovremennye aspekty profilaktiki koksartroza. Proryvnye nauchnye issledovaniya kak dvigatel' nauki. 2017: 8-9.
8. Grehov R.A., Aleksandrova N.V., Aleksandrov A.V. Ocenka effektivnosti lecheniya bol'nyh osteoartrozom s pomosch'yu kriteriya kachestva zhizni pacientov. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoy revmatologii. 2018: 142-149.
9. Ye Y. Platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery. 2018; (53): 279-287.
10. Drapkina O.M. Osteoartrit v praktike vracha-terapevta: algoritm diagnostiki i vybora terapii. Profilakticheskaya medicina. 2018; 21(6): 12-22.
11. Zhadyaev N.A., Kondrat'ev S.P., Zhadyaev R.N. Otdalennye rezul'taty primeneniya keramiko-polietilenovyh par treniya pri endoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava. Nacional'nye proekty: vyzovy i resheniya. 2020: 471-474.
12. Ivanova A.V., Daudova P.G., Optovko D.A. Osobennosti techeniya osteoartrita s razlichnymi fenotipami i komorbidnymi zabolevaniyami. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoy mediciny. 2019: 89-94.
13. Kayafa A.M., Okaєvich O.A. Analiz otdalennyh rezul'tatov endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava pri perelomah bedrennoy kosti v vertel'noy oblasti. Vіsnik morfologії. 2017; 23(1): 61-64.
14. Korol'ko A.S. Populyacionnaya harakteristika pacientov s koksartrozom. Izvestiya Nacional'noy akademii nauk Belarusi. Seriya medicinskih nauk. 2019; 16(2): 156-165.
15. Lipov D.S. Biologicheskaya rol' matriksnyh metalloproteinaz v processe vozniknoveniya i progressirovaniya osteoartroza. Aktual'nye problemy eksperimental'noy i klinicheskoy mediciny. 2018: 492-492.
16. Wiznia D.H. Factors That Influence Bone-Ingrowth Fixation of Press-Fit Acetabular Cups. JBJS Reviews. 2019; 7(6): e2 p. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00147
17. Lychagin A.V. Otdalennye funkcional'nye rezul'taty pervichnogo total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava pri drenirovanii rany. Medicinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala. 2018; 19(4): 25-28.
18. Lyubchak V.V. Srednesrochnye i otdalennye rezul'taty endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava s ispol'zovaniem pary treniya metall-metall. Hirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2019; (10): 55-61.
19. Hannouche D. Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: what is the evidence? EFORT Open Reviews. 2018; 3(1): 7-14.
20. Mazurov V.I., Trofimova A.S., Trofimov E.A. Faktory riska i nekotorye aspekty patogeneza osteoartrita. Vestnik Severo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta im. I.I. Mechnikova. 2016; 8(2): 116-124.
21. Menschikova T.I. Ul'trazvukovye kriterii diagnostiki razlichnyh stadiy pervichnogo i vtorichnogo koksartroza. Rossiyskiy elektronnyy zhurnal luchevoy diagnostiki. 2019; 9(1): 75-88.
22. Onischuk V.V. Vozmozhnosti terapevticheskogo vliyaniya na patogeneticheskie zven'ya razvitiya deformiruyuschego osteoartroza. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019; (1): 19-19.
23. Petrova A.A., Dorzheev V.V. Otdalennye rezul'taty total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaya klinicheskaya bol'nica № 1» g. Chity. Aktual'nye voprosy travmatologii i ortopedii. 2017: 91-93.
24. Markatos K., Savvidou O.D., Foteinou A., Kosmadaki S., Trikoupis I., Goumenos S.D., Papagelopoulos P.J. Hallmarks in the History and Development of Total Hip Arthroplasty. Surgical Innovation. 2020: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620947209
25. Petrova A.A., Shestakov I.A., Il'in I.V. Rezul'taty total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava v GUZ «Gorodskaya klinicheskaya bol'nica № 1» g. Chity 2015-2018 gg. Medicina zavtrashnego dnya. 2019: 109-109.
26. Plaksina T.V. Sovremennye tendencii terapii osteoartroza. Remedium Privolzh'e. 2017; (2): 32-36.
27. Serikova-Esengel'dina D.S., Goremykina M.V., Glushkova N.E. Epidemiologicheskie aspekty osteoartroza i total'nogo endoprotezirovaniya. Nauka i Zdravoohranenie. 2019; (5): 5-10.
28. Tihilov R.M., Shubnyakov M.I., Boyarov A.A., Denisov A.O., Shubnyakov I.I. Vliyanie razlichnyh faktorov na tempy iznosa polietilenovogo vkladysha v endoprotezah tazobedrennogo sustava. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2018; 24(1): 18-28.
29. Cherkasov M.A., Tihilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Kovalenko A.N., Mugutdinov Z.A. Udovletvorennost' pacientov posle pervichnogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava: prediktory uspeha. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2018; 24(3): 45-54.
30. Shavlovskaya O.A. Effektivnost' lokal'noy terapii NPVP pri OA razlichnoy lokalizacii. Medicinskiy sovet. 2017; (11): 18-22.
31. Shishkova V. Sovremennyy vzglyad na vybor bezopasnoy terapii pri bolyah v sustavah i spine u pacienta s komorbidnoy patologiey. Vrach. 2018; 29(5): 72-80.
32. Shubnyakov I.I., Riahi A., Shubnyakov M.I., Denisov A.O., Huzhanazarov I.E., Tihilov R.M. Bescementnye bedrennye komponenty: istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie voprosa. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2020; 26(2): 160-179.
33. Flemming D.J., Gustas-French C.N. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis: a review of the clinical and radiologic presentation. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2017; 19(7): 42 p.
34. Foucher K.C. Gait abnormalities before and after total hip arthroplasty differ in men and women. Journal of Biomechanics. 2016; 49(14): 3582-3586.
35. Güler T., Sivas F., Yurdakul F.G., Çelen E., Utkan A., Başkan B., Bodur H., Özkurt B. Early improvement in physical activity and function after total hip arthroplasty: Predictors of outcomes. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019; 65(4): 379-388.
36. Hofstede S.N. Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016; 17(1): 212 p.
37. Hoskins W. Polished cemented femoral stems have a lower rate of revision than matt finished cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 96,315 cemented femoral stems. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(5): 1472-1476.
38. Lobanov G.V. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie asepticheskogo nekroza golovki bedra. Sovremennye aspekty travmatologii, ortopedii i rekonstruktivnoy hirurgii. 2019: 75-77.
39. Huynh C., Puyraimond Zemmour D., Maillefert J.F. Factors associated with the orthopaedic surgeon’s decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1905 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018; 26(10).
40. Jeschke E. Obesity increases the risk of postoperative complications and revision rates following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 131,576 total hip arthroplasty cases. The Journal of Aarthroplasty. 2018; 33(7): 2287-2292.
41. Vorokov A.A. Endoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava: opredelenie pokazaniy k operacii (nauchnyy obzor). Mediko-farmacevticheskiy zhurnal Pul's. 2020; 22(6): 40-50.
42. Jones M.D., Buckle C.L. How does aseptic loosening occur and how can we prevent it? Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2020; 34(3): 146-152.
43. Karachalios T., Komnos G., Koutalos A. Total hip arthroplasty: Survival and modes of failure. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018; 3(5): 232-239.
44. Izmalkov S.N., Bratiychuk A.N., Usov A.K., Kuropatkin G.V. Srednesrochnye i otdalennye rezul'taty cementnoy fiksacii vertluzhnogo komponenta pri total'nom endoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava. Vestnik novyh medicinskih tehnologiy. 2017; 24(2): 88-94.
45. Konan S., Duncan C.P. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with neuromuscular imbalance. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2018; 100(1): 17-21.
46. Kumar P. Quality of life following total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular fractures, previously managed by open reduction and internal fixation. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2016; 19(4): 206-208.
47. Kurcz B. Osteolysis as it pertains to total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics. 2018; 49(4): 419-435.
48. Lamb J.N. A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2019; 101(7): 779-786.
49. Maslennikov S.O., Golovaha M.L. Biomechanical aspects of the development of hip dislocation after hip arthroplasty. TRAUMA. 2017; 18(6): 36-42.
50. McIlwraith C.W. Biomarkers for equine joint injury and osteoarthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2018; 36(3): 823-831.
51. Meermans G. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. The bone & Joint Journal. 2017; 99(6): 732-740.
52. Gorbatov R.O. Revizionnoe endoprotezirovanie krupnyh sustavov s ispol'zovaniem individual'nyh gibridnyh endoprotezov. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019; (4): 50 c.
53. Murphy N.J., Eyles J.P., Hunter D.J. Hip osteoarthritis: etiopathogenesis and implications for management. Advances in Therapy. 2016; 33(11): 1921-1946.
54. Niemczewska-Wójcik M., Piekoszewski W. The surface topography of a metallic femoral head and its influence on the wear mechanism of a polymeric acetabulum. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2017; (17): 307-317.
55. Nistor D.V. Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach versus lateral approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders. 2018; 3(1): 18 p.
56. Maksimova I.A. Neyrogennaya bol' u bol'nyh osteoartrozom. Alleya nauki. 2020; 1(1): 279-282.
57. Pineda M.M.S. Analgesic effect and functional improvement caused by radiofrequency treatment of genicular nerves in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee until 1 year following treatment. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2017; 42(1): 62-68.
58. Sato H. Effect of femoral offset and limb length discrepancy on hip joint muscle strength and gait trajectory after total hip arthroplasty. Gait & Posture. 2020; (77): 276-282.
59. Winther S.B. Increased muscle strength limits postural sway during daily living activities in total hip arthroplasty patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2020; 99(7): 608 p.
60. Zhang L. Local Cellular Responses to Metallic and Ceramic Nanoparticles from Orthopedic Joint Arthroplasty Implants. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020; (15): 6705 p.
