Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова, Москва, Россия
Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова, Москва, Россия
AIM. The purpose of this work was to study the somatotypological characteristics of patients with non-communicable diseases and obesity of class 1, 2 and 3; compare three methods to evaluate the somatotype using three types of complex formulas according to the Heath-Carter scheme; to check the reliability and informativeness of the method of bioimpedance evaluation of somatotype components by regression formulas used in bioimpedance analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 145 patients (67 men, mean age 41.4±10.3 years and 78 women, mean age 40.6±9.4 years) with class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity, were examined at the clinic of the Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology. Anthropometric measurements were taken. Bioimpedance evaluation of body composition was performed using the analyzer ABC-01 "Medas". The somatotype was determined according to the Heath-Carter scheme using three types of complex formulas – based on anthropometry and based on a bioimpedance study of body composition. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. Based on anthropometric and bioimpedance studies, a characterization of somatotypes according to the Heath-Carter scheme in patients with alimentary-dependent pathologies and class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity is presented. Significant differences were shown in the values of the somatotype components ENDO and MESO, obtained by calculation using the formulas implemented in the software of the bioimpedance analyzer, from the values obtained by calculating by formulas based on anthropometry. CONCLUSION. The degree of gender dimorphism was different when determining the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in patients with class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity, and it depended on what particular formulas were used to calculate the scores. Pronounced gender dimorphism was noted when using both versions of the regression formulas, because they take into account the gender of the individual being examined. It was shown that these formulas are not applicable for evaluation of the components of the somatotype in persons with obesity of class 1, class 2 and class, because the coefficients of determination do not correspond to those previously obtained for a group of people with normal BMI values. We consider it expedient to develop new regression equations for evaluation of the somatotype of the above category of patients.
anthropometry, bioimpedance, physique, body composition, Heath-Carter somatotype, patients with non-communicable diseases, class 1, class 2 and class 3 obesity
1. Nikityuk D.B. Antroponutriciologiya: razvitie idey osnovopolozhnikov novogo nauchnogo napravleniya. Voprosy pitaniya. 2020; 89(4): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.24411/0042-8833-2020-10044
2. Nikityuk D.B. Antroponutriciologiya kak novoe nauchnoe napravlenie. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2018; 7(4): 9-19. https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-9-19
3. Alekseeva N.T., Rozhkova E.A., Klochkova S.V., Nikityuk D.B., Gasymova T.M., Kesemenli A.K. Osobennosti ploschadi poverhnosti tela u zhenschin raznyh somatotipov v vozrastnom aspekte. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2017; 6(2): 9-13.
4. Britton K.A., Massaro J.M., Murabito J.M., Kreger B.E., Hoffmann U., Fox C.S. Body Fat Distribution, Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and All cause Mortality. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013; 62(10): 921-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.027
5. Kang H.W., Seo S.P., Lee H.Y., Kim K., Ha Y.S., Kim W.T., Kim Y.J., Yun S.J., Kim W.J., Lee S.C. A high basal metabolic rate is an independent predictor of stone recurrence in obese patients. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2021; 62(2): 195-200. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200438
6. Bukavneva N.S., Nikityuk D.B. Konstitucional'nye osobennosti bol'nyh s alimentarno zavisimoy patologiey. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2008; 1(1-2): 145-146.
7. Nikolenko V.N., Nikityuk D.B., Chava S.V. Otechestvennaya konstitucional'naya anatomiya v aspekte personificirovannoy mediciny. Sechenovskiy vestnik. 2013; (4): 9-17.
8. Pashkova I.G., Gayvoronskiy I.V., Nikityuk D.B. Somatotip i komponentnyy sostav tela vzroslogo cheloveka. Sankt-Peterburg. SpecLit. 2019: 159 c.
9. Carter J.E.L. The heath-carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction manual. San Diego State University. San Diego. CA. 2002; (4): 26 p.
10. Heath B.H., Carter J.E.L. A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1967; 27(1): 57-74.
11. Sheldon W.H., Stevens S.S., Tucker W.B. The varieties of human physique. Harper and Brothers. New York. 1940.
12. Carter J.E.L., Carter J.E.L., Heath B.H. Somatotyping: development and applications. Cambridge university press. 1990; (5): 182-197.
13. Koleva M., Nacheva A., Boev M. Somatotype and disease prevalence in adults. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2002; 17(1): 65-84.
14. Martirosov E.G, Nikolaev D.V., Rudnev S.G. Tehnologii i metody opredeleniya sostava tela cheloveka. Moskva. Nauka. 2006: 248 c.
15. Kolesnikov V.A., Rudnev S.G., Nikolaev D.V., Anisimova A.V., Godina E.Z. O novom protokole ocenki somatotipa po sheme Hit-Kartera v programmnom obespechenii bioimpedansnogo analizatora sostava tela. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. XXIII. Antropologiya. 2016; (4): 4-13.
16. Sindeeva L.V., Rudnev S.G. Harakteristika polovozrastnoy izmenchivosti somatotipa po Hit-Karteru u vzroslyh lyudey i vozmozhnosti ego bioimpedansnoy ocenki (na primere russkogo naseleniya Vostochnoy Sibiri). Morfologiya. 2017; 151(1): 77-87.
17. Anisimova A.V., Godina E.Z., Nikolaev D.V., Rudnev S.G., Simini F., Bertemes-Filho P. Evaluation of the Heath-Carter somatotype revisited: new bio- impedance equations for children and adolescents. IFMBE Proceedings. Singapore-Heidelberg: Springer. 2016; (54): 80-83.
18. Rudnev S.G., Negasheva M.A., Godina E.Z. Assessment of the Heath-Carter somatotype in adults using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1272(1): 012001.
19. Deryabin V.E. Kratkiy spravochnik po resheniyu tipovyh zadach biometricheskoy obrabotki antropologicheskih dannyh. Moskva. 2005. Rukopis', deponirovannaya v VINITI №1187-V2005 ot 29.08.2005.
20. Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Lapik I.A., Sheragulova V.S., Lebedeva V.A., Lavrinenko S.V., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Zaynudinov Z.M., Nikityuk D.B. Somatotipologicheskie harakteristiki pacientov s alimentarno-zavisimoy patologiey v aspekte polovogo dimorfizma. Medicina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2020; (4): 87-94.
21. Klochkova S.V., Rozhkova E.A., Alekseeva N.T., Nikityuk D.B., Atyakshin D.A., Kesemenli A.K., Gasymova T.M. Osobennosti soderzhaniya zhirovoy i myshechnoy mass u devushek raznyh konstitucional'nyh grupp. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2017; 6(1): 39-42.
22. Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Lapik I.A., Strutynskaya M.A., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Nikityuk D.B. Topografiya zhirootlozheniya u pacientov s ali- mentarno-zavisimoy patologiey v aspekte polovogo dimorfizma. Medicina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2021; (4): 190-202.
23. Yang L.T., Wang N., Li Z.X., Liu C., He X., Zhang J.F., Han H., Wen Y.F., Qian Y.H., Xi H.J. Study on the adult physique with the Heath-Carter anthropo- metric somatotype in the Han of Xi’an. China. Anatomical Science International. 2016; 91(2): 180-187.
24. Pastuszak A., Gajewski J., Buśko K. The impact of skinfolds measurement on somatotype determination in Heath-Carter method. PLOS One. 2019; 14(9): e0222100 p.
25. Rudnev S.G., Anisimova A.V., Sindeeva L.V., Zadorozhnaya L.V., Lukina S.S., Malahina A.V., Godina E.Z. Metodicheskie voprosy izucheniya variaciy podkozhnogo zhira: sravnenie razlichnyh tipov kaliperov. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. XXIII. Antropologiya. 2017; (3): 4-26.
